CEU eTD Collection (2010); Sindrestean, Alexandra: The Post, the Trans, and the Cosmo of Citizenship. A critical Study on Seyla Benhabib

CEU Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2010
Author Sindrestean, Alexandra
Title The Post, the Trans, and the Cosmo of Citizenship. A critical Study on Seyla Benhabib
Summary This paper is concerned with recent theoretical developments that seek to address state citizenship in the context of migration. The scholarly preoccupation is twofold: on one hand, there is a sociological interest in tackling with actual changes of state practices in terms of citizenship and immigration laws; on the other hand, new conceptualizations regard the analytical level and are directed towards questioning conceptual categories we rely on when we reflect upon reality.
Contemporary migration appears as a challenge to the nation-state. Migrants are supposed to disturb the assumption on which the nation-state functions: the coincidence between people, territory and political authority. If we take for example the case of Gellner, one of the most influential theoreticians on nation state, nationalism is a political principle that assumes the political unit, i.e. state, to be coterminous with the cultural unit – nation. This becomes especially relevant when one considers the aspect of citizenship.
Citizenship, therefore, is not strictly just a legal concept, and can lend itself to various interpretative schemes. My stake in this paper concerns the scholarship that reflects, questions, and re-configures citizenship as a conceptual category in the ambit of political theory. In this sense, I focus broadly on conceptualizations that explicitly read into citizenship national identification, national attachment or national belongingness and proceed from thereon to indicate how migration has a de-nationalizing effect on how citizenship is understood.
More particularly, I concentrate on Seyla Benhabib and her cosmopolitan re-writing of citizenship. The reason for choosing Benhabib is twofold. First of all, I intend to question how her professed moral-political analysis (moral universalism and moral-political equality) spells out citizenship. Secondly, I try to partially vindicate what I think is innovative in Benhabib’s work: her argumentative line of cosmopolitan justice leads her to address the just distribution of political membership and envisage naturalization as human right.
Supervisor Szabolcs Pogonyi
Department Nationalism Studies MA
Full texthttps://www.etd.ceu.edu/2010/sindrestean_alexandra.pdf

Visit the CEU Library.

© 2007-2021, Central European University